Showing posts with label The Community. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Community. Show all posts

10 March 2009

City Hearing Today

Today at 1:00 PM the City of Boston is holding a hearing regarding an ordinance/amendment proposed by City Council President Michael P. Ross that would result in Universities having to report the addresses of all off-campus students to the City of Boston to help enforce the "no more than four undergraduate students" law that prohibits five or more undergraduate students from sharing the same apartment. Given that it is apartment hunting season and many current residents may be looking to head off-campus this summer or in the fall, we wanted to pass along the information on today's hearing:

Docket #0283 - An Ordinance Increasing University Accountability
Time: 1:00 PM
Date: Tuesday, March 10th, 2009
Location: City Hall - Christopher Iannella Chambers (5th Floor)
Address: 1 City Hall Square, Boston, MA 02201-1020

You can read more information on this topic at The Boston Globe, at the blog of Student Body President Rob Ranley, and from Councilor Ross himself.

18 August 2008

GrandMarc Issue Sent Back To Committee

After a long debate, the General Council decided that it was not yet time to take a stance on the topic of Northeastern placing students in the proposed GrandMarc at St. Boltoph Street, and voted down the Sense of the Council that had been brought forth. However, the General Council formally referred the matter to the Housing Services Committee, so we'll be dealing with it later in the year.

12 August 2008

Our GrandMarc Comments

If you read the housing blog during the last couple months, you'll know that the Resident Student Association was very active in the public comment process for the proposed GrandMarc at St. Boltoph Street. We culminated our work on a public comment with a letter of comment and accompanying legislation. You can read the entire document, known as Council Resolution S2-08-1, here in PDF form. Our work related to the GrandMarc isn't done. We're currently working to address the topic of Northeastern University possibly leasing a block of space in the building for students to live in leased housing. If you have comments on this topic, feel free to post them here on the blog.

17 July 2008

Public Comment for the GrandMarc

On the Housing Blog we've had several posts related to the GrandMarc on St. Boltoph Street. While the Resident Student Association may issue an opinion on behalf of the residents at Northeastern, as we head off to the public meeting I want to let you blog readers know that as members of "the public" you can send the Boston Redevelopment Authority your comments on the project during the public comment period. In order to do so, please mail your comment letters to:

Mr. Jay Rourke
Boston Redevelopment Authority
One City Hall Square
Boston, MA 02201-1007

You can also e-mail your comment to Jay.Rourke.BRA@CityofBoston.gov. Comments must be submitted by to August 1, 2008.

Additionally, we have another document for your viewing pleasure. It's what the proponents gave us on Wednesday. You can view it here.

GrandMarc Public Meeting

A public meeting is set to take place today at 6:00 PM in the YMCA meeting room. The meeting is for community input and questions on the GrandMarc proposed for St. Boltoph Street. All residents are encouraged to come. The Housing Services Committee will be there. While we probably will not be blogging live as we did today, we'll be sure to update everyone.

16 July 2008

Live Blog: GrandMarc Presentation to the Student Body

Several members of the Housing Services Committee and other members of the student body and some from the Student Government Association are currently in 333 Curry Student Center awaiting the beginning of a presentation to the student body about the GrandMarc proposed for St. Boltoph Street. I'll be updating every few minutes or so with what's going on.

7:09 PM Here to talk to us is Jason Reynolds from Dallas of Phoenix Property Company and also a member from Lincoln Property Company. Lincoln has about 3500 people nationally and they are in every major city in the country, including several buildings in Boston. They're going over some of the other development projects they do. They're going over some of the key facts and points about the building. They also are mentioning the students they are targeting: those who attend colleges in the Fenway area.

7:12 PM: In total, there are about ten students here along with a couple members of the University administration in the area of Enrollment Management and Student Affairs. The proponents of the project are mentioning how they are the first ones to try a private residence hall in Boston. They've done it elsewhere leasing directly to students, but in Boston they "modified the plan to go to leasing blocks of rooms" to institutions. Berklee is looking at 300-400 beds, and the Colleges of the Fenway including Wentworth, Emmanuel, and Simmons are also looking at buying beds.

7:12 PM: Part of their plan includes allowing Universities to put in their own RAs and also they surveyed and found that the idea of mixing students from different schools together would not be an issue, which gave them encouragement to leasing to individual students. However, a City of Boston concern was "where's the control and management" of the system since there wasn't a direct link back to a school. Also, a brief mention of how they are meeting issues from students related to feedback from the community. We have a 8 page document which we'll try to get scanned and made available or obtain from the GrandMarc proponents.

7:18 PM: The proponents claim that the issue of non-students in the building is a non-issue, because they now can limit the housing to full-time students. This is interesting, because at last month's community meeting community members seemed to believe otherwise. Also, students would not be totally stuck with someone if there were roommate conflicts because they can relocate or move people and if an institution leases a block they can choose where students go within that block. Reynolds mentioned how they have a community assistant program, where some residents act as an adviser and in return they get discounted (or free) rent. The community assistants aren't there to enforce rules strictly, but rather to help safety out. Reynolds gave the example that if someone was rolling a keg down the hall, a community assistant could notice it and let security know and put a stop to the activity for the good of others. Longwood Security was hired to create a plan, and Longwood Security has done other securing of buildings and has worked with institutions like Berklee. Also, students who get caught breaking the rules will have their school notified and parents notified.

7:26 PM: The issue of no dining facility was mentioned. There will be mostly apartment-style living with kitchens (85% of the facility, to be exact). The question was put forth to students "do students use kitchens" and there was some talk about the use of kitchens and it was mentioned how Northeastern upperclass residence halls all have kitchens. Additionally, elected city officials prefer to see no dining facility because students can go to local businesses and express their purchasing power there or even get a job at local businesses.

7:33 PM: I asked about how they would deal with the current residents at the YMCA during construction and where they would live. The answer is that they'll move them to the back of the building while the front is renovated and then they'll construct a fire wall and move the residents to the renovated area and then renovate the back side of the building. Some bad news -- individual residents won't be allowed to sublease their space out to others. They'll have to go through a program GrandMarc offers. Also, Reynolds said that they might be able to accommodate the cooperative education program at Northeastern which he believes is "integral" to the institution. A point was made that the move-in and move-out is pretty easy for students because everything is fully furnished. The proponents said that 796 beds wasn't much, and that there could be no ability for Northeastern students to live in the building if other schools buy up the space.

7:39 PM: The proponents asked about how Northeastern housing works for upperclassmen. Members of the Housing Services Committee informed them about the process and they said their target is those students who want to live near or on-campus, but can't because of a lack of housing. Another proponent here is Michael Vaughn, a community and government consultant. They also mentioned that they will bill people for using utilities such as electricity over a certain level and that a basic cable package would be provided and students would have the option to upgrade to premium packages. On the topic of security, they mentioned how guests must be signed in and leave an ID at the front desk and sign out.

7:47 PM: Christopher Brielman, a Housing Services Committee member asked about why the security seems to be so "draconian" and stricter than Northeastern. He raised the issue of community building and how it could be hard to develop a community and there might be 24 different communities. Vaughn responded that they erred on the side of more strict because of concerns over security. It was mentioned that schools would have a say, and if a school leased a block of rooms they could say their students can access all the floors the school leases. Vaughn stated that they did a lot of market research. Reynolds asked how students find apartments off-campus and asked if students wanted on-site management. I asked about the building and concerns that the company will sell the building off after a few years and that a new company may not have the same ideals and the building could go downhill. They said that it is important to them that students live living in the building because they want to have people live there year-after-year and keep revenue coming in to give them a return on their investment. Also, a benefit to the City of Boston is that nearby landlords will need to be more competitive and meet the standards the GrandMarc provides.

7:50 PM: Reynolds spoke to us about amenities that they will have to target students. Northeastern's Senior Vice President for Enrollment Management and Student Affairs, Philomena Mantella, asked the proponents if they could give us a price in today's dollars. Reynolds didn't give an exact price, but said that an average is around $1,100. He said that a unit could be $2000 a month, or $800 a month, depending on the size, and that 15% of the area will be a traditional dormitory style building with a price that could be around $600 to $700. Also, all the pricing is single-occupancy rooms.

7:55 PM: The proponents said that the building will eventually be sold, as it is a for-profit venture, but that their equity partner does not want to be seen as "flipping" properties. They also talked about how they look at making the lease options for institutions flexible for balance sheet reasons.

7:57 PM: Michael Raphael, who is the SGA Representative for the Resident Student Association, asked why this is so close to northeastern if they want to reach so many schools. They said they want to have Northeastern lease space. The reason the site is so near Northeastern is because that was where the land was available. Also, the YMCA will be upgraded through the process. Vaughn also mentioned how brand new YMCAs will be built in West Roxbury, Hyde Park, and the North End from this project.

7:59 PM: Representative Raphael asked another question, about how the turnaround could lead to more traffic on St. Boltoph Street. The proponents said that the turnaround was added because Northeastern had concerns, and that the turnaround was a change from the original PNF due to community concern.

8:04 PM: Christopher Brielman asked how the GrandMarc could help Northeastern phase out its Master Leased Properties Program faster. The proponents said that Northeastern can do this by building housing on campus and transferring students out of the leased properties. I asked how this is phasing out the MLPP, as it would be leasing space in a new facility. There was also a point raised by Senior Vice President Mantella up that the City of Boston could see Northeastern replacing one lease with another if Northeastern replaced current leased properties with the GrandMarc.

8:05 PM: SGA President Ranley asked about conduct of students and relation to Codes of Conduct. The response was that the rules are very similar to University codes of conduct and laws (eg. felonies are not allowed, you can't give underage people alcohol).

8:11 PM: The proponents brought up how parents can be informed if students violate rules because they co-sign on leases. They said all students have to have parents co-sign, but that there are some cases where an income test is used and usually students alone cannot qualify. Also, Reynolds said that parents can have their credit reports damaged if a student commits "three strikes" and is evicted. I asked them if in their market research they looked at whether or not students wanted to have their parents required to co-sign and how students wanted accountability to work. Reynolds said they did not, but they may put that topic on a future survey. A question came up about graduate students and it was said that graduate students could be housed with University blocks. Reynolds said graduate student housing is a huge issue nationwide, and they want to accommodate the demand.

8:16 PM: Vice President Ryan Fox raised the issue of concern to Northeastern about the GrandMarc limiting Northeastern's ability to expand housing for its own students and goals of bringing students back to campus. A "loaded question" came from a Housing Services Committee member about what benefit would Northeastern see if none of its students live in the building. The response from Vaughn was that we should ask our administrators, because they expected Northeastern to try to buy the land but they did not. Vaughn said they would "love to lease this building to Northeastern," and that they will "be a good neighbor." Reynolds reiterated "we'd love to fill it [the GrandMarc] with Northeastern students."

8:20 PM: Senior Vice President Mantella said for the building to be a high-quality residential facility, they might need to look at many conditions and look at the interests of the students, the University, and the politics. Reynolds said that they don't need master leases, and that they build the building and make beds available to Northeastern students outside of a master lease. Vaughn said that they respect Northeastern's work to build good relationships with the neighborhood, and understood Northeastern's hesitance to supporting the project and making known a desire to lease a block of space.

8:22 PM: I asked about pedestrian traffic and how 800 more people will impact the Green Line. Vaughn said that the students are already here in the community, which is what the community members at last month's public meeting already rejected as a statement based on assumptions that were untrue. The proponents pointed to traffic analysis in the Draft Project Impact Report and offered to make their traffic consultant available.

8:25 PM: I asked about gender neutral housing in the GrandMarc and if they had plans for it. They said they didn't have plans, but then Vaughn said that the housing would be "market driven," and a University leasing a block could offer it. Additionally, we were told that ADA compliance would exist for disabled individuals.

8:26 PM: I missed the name of the person from Lincoln Property Company -- he is John Cappellano, the Senior Vice President for Development and Construction.

8:27 PM: The meeting is now over. I gave one of the proponents my RSA business card asking for a copy of the documents they gave out so we can make those available.

This concludes the live blog coverage of the meeting. We'll have more for you in the next week as we approach July 24th -- the date of our next committee meeting.

09 July 2008

GrandMarc Presentation from General Council

Miss General Council tonight? Don't worry -- our presentation about the GrandMarc proposed for St. Boltoph Street is available here for viewing (PDF). Also, the full Draft Project Impact Report (DPIR) can be downloaded here (PDF). Please note that the DPIR report is over 120 MB in size and is more than 500 pages, so it may take a few minutes to download over a high-speed connection and several hours on dial-up.

29 June 2008

GrandMarc In Minnesotta Slightly Better

Earlier in the week we mentioned how there are other GrandMarc buildings in the country targeted at students like the proposed GrandMarc on St. Boltoph Street. The one near UC Riverside had a super majority of students who did not recommend the building. In Minneapolis, Minnesotta, the GrandMarc at Seven Corners has just a 33% rate of recommendation according to ApartmentRatings.com. That means two-thirds of reviewers do not recommend the building.

Some of the problems with the GrandMarc at Seven Corners include issues with management losing documentation and improperly billing residents, trash and cleanliness, and facilities problems. Here's a comment from one reviewer:

The place was a hole when I moved in. When I moved out they charged me $400 dollars for damages that were there when I got there. I had filled out a sheet when I first moved in listing the damages, but they claimed to have lost it. There was nothing else I could do. They also charged my roommate $400, so that's another $800 they got out of us.
Another reviewer wrote:
Sinks leak and water drips from units above! Our light above sink filled with water and fell from the ceiling due to weight and broke all over.

With the problems at more than one GrandMarc building elsewhere in the country, I ask the readers of the blog to comment on whether or not they would want to live in a similar building in the Northeastern area. In the coming weeks the Housing Services Committee and the Resident Student Association will be discussing the GrandMarc proposed for St. Boltoph's Street in-depth and making comment on it before the public comment period closes on August 1st.

23 June 2008

GrandMarc Not Recommended At UC Riverside

Last week Assistant Vice President Gagnon and I attended a public meeting about the re-proposed GrandMarc on St. Boltoph Street. Also in attendance from Northeastern was Ryan Fox, who will be SGA Vice President for Student Services starting tomorrow; Robert Ranley who will be SGA President starting tomorrow; and Jeff Doggett, who is Northeastern's Director of Government Relations & Community Affairs. Cut down to 24 stories, and with a capacity of about 800, there are still many community concerns over the proposal. (Unfortunately, photos and renderings of the new design are not yet available in electronic format for us -- but you can see the old ones at this website.)

The GrandMarc proposed for St. Boltoph's Street is not an entirely new concept. There are a couple other GrandMarc's in the country. One of them is located near the University of California - Riverside. The building, called GrandMarc at University Village, is not recommended by current and previous students who lived in the building. In fact, 78% of students who posted reviews of the building at ApartmentRatings.com said "No" when asked if they would recommend the building to others. While this alone is an indication of the problems related to the GrandMarc and its management companies, the specific issues mentioned in some of the reviews are even worse.

One student, who actually recommended the building, wrote about some of the security problems with the building:

The gate is usually broken which means that ANYONE can come in and do anything. There are frequent break-ins for the people who live on the 1st floor.

Clearly, the safety of students is a priority for us in the Resident Student Association. Our campus ranked #2 in safety in the nation in Reader's Digest. While the proponents of the GrandMarc at St. Boltoph's Street claim they will provide a secure environment where students will be safe, their performance record at UC Riverside is concerning. Another reviewer wrote about the theft issues, saying:

Terrible place to live. No security, lots of things get stolen.

Yet another reviewer wrote about security issues with their door lock, and the lack of response to correct it:

The locks on the doors to your individual rooms serve no purpose since me and my roomate found out that all you need is a plastic card to pick the lock and open the door. On top of that, somehow the lock on our front door broke, and all u had to do was turn the handle and it openend right up. It took maintenance a week to finally come by and fix it.


The GrandMarc at UC Riverside

More concerning is the number of students who wrote about issues with the building's management. I've heard bad stories about student experiences with Housing and Residential Life at Northeastern, but some of the reviews about the GrandMarc at UC Riverside are horror stories compared to the problems students have had at Northeastern. One student wrote about how management lied to them about the amenities of the building:

I had nothing but problems from the moment I moved in. First of all, I was told that internet access and parking for myself and my guests were included in the rent. A few months later, I was told that to get a parking space close to my apartment I would have to pay $15. Also, my guests had to park all the way across the street or they would get their car towed. Tow trucks are part of the parking lot scenery. The internet that was promised cost me 15 additional dollars a month. And the place is filthy! They clean it maybe twice a year when offering tours for prospective residents. And don't count on management to help you with any problems or issues you have. Please don't live here!

Another student wrote about how management was difficult to find or help residents:

The office assistants at GrandMarc seemed to be only trained in getting people to sign contrats to live here and little else. Customer service is great for prospective customers but once you live here there is no help to be found. Management are somehow always busy or away on extended lunches/breaks.

As a representative of the students who live on-campus at Northeastern, I would hate to see any student leave Northeastern University housing for someplace like the GrandMarc. Additionally, many community members oppose the building and attended last week's meeting to say so. The track record of the company behind this is not good. If they can't manage a set of four-story buildings for student housing well, why should the community and students trust them to manage a 24-story building? Even worse was the refusal of the GrandMarc's proponents to provide straight answers to questions from community members and from the Resident Student Association. It seems that the best solution for both students and the local community will be for the Boston Redevelopment Authority to join with the community and reject this building.

16 June 2008

The GrandMarc

Phoenix Property Company recently filed plans with the City of Boston to put a 24-story tower on the land now occupied by part of the Huntington Avenue YMCA. The tower will feature space that can be rented by bedspace instead of by apartment, and is geared towards students.

Several issues exist with the GrandMarc. In the Resident Student Association, strong opposition exists to the building. Additionally, there have been many problems reported in Phoenix Property Co.'s other facilities in the country. There are also concerns over building this tower at the same time as Northeastern's 22 story building where Cullinane Hall is located.

On Thursday, June 19th there is a public meeting to address questions and concerns by community members. The meeting is being held at the YMCA library meeting room at 6:00 PM. Myself, along with members of the Housing Services Committee and the Student Government Association will be attending. I encourage any interested students to come.